If something makes sense, all can be added
Can you please describe in detail, what exact behavior you are look for!
What should a "StartWithNextOfPreviousTrackAndEndWithRampOfNextTrack" transition do, if:
- the transition track is shorter in time that the time between Next and Ramp
- the transition track is longer in time that the time between Next and Ramp
And... as the NEXT cue-point of the previous track is by definition always equal to the CUEIN cue-point of the next track, I even assume, that this transition is already existing: see VO_StartWithCueInOrEndWithRampOfNextTrack.
If not, please describe what you are looking for and what is different to the above.
But...you are talking about more options... what others exactly?
I currently don't see many more
The 'VO_' transitions are different, because these will, in case the transition track is too long, let the transition track stay (as an independent track) within the playlist (as aid, only in case if bigger than the related cue-point).
For example:
If the transition track is longer than the ramp time, a 'regular' EndWithRampOfNextTrack transition will still start it with CueIn and thus might overlap the effective ramp position.
Whereas the VO_EndWithRampOfNextTrack transition would start such a transition track stand-alone before the next track actually starts and thus ensures an exact ending with the ramp cue-point.
Or in other words:
The VO_ transitions ensure an exact ending with the related cue-point; whereas the others ensure, that the transition happens within the related track.